Chhattisgarh
Sonakhan village
,
Sonakhan
,
Baloda Bazar
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
Baghmara Gold Mine in Chhattisgarh's Sonakhan To Displace Over 10,000 Tribespeople
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
2803
People affected
2016
Year started
474
Land area affected
Households affected
2803
People Affected
2016
Year started
474
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Gold Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Gold Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In the firstever auction of a gold mine in the country, Baghmara Gold Mine in Sonakhan village was put up for sale in 2016 after multiple surveys. The mine is located in Kasdol block in Baloda Bazar district and has 2,700 kilograms of gold reserve. Vedanta Resources, which won the auction, was expected to begin mining in the next two years.  However, the mine was reportedly auctioned without consulting the residents of the 24 neighbouring villages, including Sonakhan. The villagers say they read about the project only in newspapers.  Consequently, the residents raised concerns about the negative impact of mining on the forests, biodiversity and water sources. They feared displacement, losing their lands and the impact on their livelihood practices. However, according to a news report, the villagers themselves stood divided as many nontribal households looked forward to the project for the job opportunities it would generate.   In March 2016, the residents came together to discuss the impact of the mines and decided to collectively object to it.   A year later, the state government revised the land area for gold mining to 474.3 hectares. The revision came after the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change directed the state Mineral Resource Department to exclude the area under an ecosensitive zone of Bar Nawapara sanctuary.  Meanwhile, the tribespeople in Sonakhan decided to apply for community forest rights titles under the Forest Rights Act, 2006. They also cited the historical significance of the village as the birthplace of an 1857 revolt martyr to avert the project. According to a 2017 news report, the villagers even approached the relevant state authorities to express their concerns, but the officials found their grievances misplaced and premature. Regardless, they continued to protest.  On January 20, 2019, the chief minister decided to review the permission granted to Vedanta for mining. Three days later, representatives from the Dalit Adivasi Manch met him and requested to cancel the lease. Following this, the state government reportedly suspended the company's mining lease.  But according to reports, Vedanta has continued to explore the region and undertake mining activities. In December 2019, the villagers took out a rally to protest against the visit of a survey team to the area demarcated for the gold mine. They allege that Vedanta had falsely claimed that the Gram Sabha of the affected villages had given a No Objection Certificate to the project. According to a news report, the project is likely to displace over 10,000 people.  Bipasha Paul, an activist, informed LCW that the district collector issued a letter based on the site inspection stating that there would be no adverse impact due to mineral prospecting work, which had been allowed on some terms and conditions to ensure this. As per an article, the finding may aid the state's decision to reissue the lease to Vedanta after the company receives the due clearances. On June 30, 2021, the regional office approved the diversion of 3.2 hectares of forestland for mineral prospecting in the demarcated mine as part of the Stage 1 forest clearance. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

12

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

State Mineral Resource Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Vedanta Resources

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Dalit Adivasi Manch, Chhattisgarh Bachao Andolan

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey


Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us