In the aftermath of the communal violence during a yatra in Nuh on 31 July 2023, the Haryana government in a five-day drive demolished several establishments (shops and houses) of Nuh residents, a majority of those affected belonged to the Muslim community, according to multiple media reports.
The reasons cited by the government in the court for demolishing the properties were that the structures were encroachments on government land or that they were unauthorised structures.
However, LCW investigation found that over 50 establishments with ‘title deeds’ and ‘settled possession’ were demolished during the drive and neither of them were constructed on ‘forest’ or ‘common' land as claimed by the government. This finding contradicted the government's claim.
Some of the residents also claimed that they were not served notices and that they didn't get enough time to take out their belongings.
In case of establishments violating building codes and regulations, the government is expected to follow a proper procedure by sending notices and giving enough time to the residents to appear and submit their stance.
According to the government affidavits, the dates of the notices served ranged from 2016 to as recent as 15 days before the demolition started. And say that the demolitions were carried out in coordination with “five departments/Public Authorities/ ULBs (Urban Local Bodies)”.
The government drew criticism as media reports flagged how a majority of those affected due to the demolition drive belonged to the Muslim community. Among the 354 people who were affected due to the demolition drive, 283 were Muslims and 71 were Hindus. The district administration, however, denied targeting a particular community and maintained that due procedure was followed.
The demolition drive was halted only after the Punjab and Haryana High Court took suo motu cognisance of the demolition drive, terming it "ethnic cleansing", and observed that “buildings belonging to a particular community were being brought down under the guise of law and order problem”. In response, the Haryana government, replied in their affidavits on August 18 that it was a routine measure taken by “independent local authorities against the unauthorised occupiers or illegal structures and that too after following the due procedure of law”.
While the government affidavit states that 443 structures were demolished, of which 162 were permanent and the remaining 281 were temporary structures, a fact-finding report by Socio-Legal Information Centre, a non-profit legal aid and educational organisation, stated that 1,208 structures at 37 sites spanning 72.1 acres were razed down.
The report added that the demolitions were carried out in approximately 11 villages and tehsils.
In February 2024, two pleas were filed in the High Court against the 'unlawful' demolition of properties in Nuh. The lawyer representing the affected parties had requested the court to group them with the earlier case. They will now be heard together from March onwards.
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Complaint against procedural violations
Demand for compensation
Demand for rehabilitation
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Type of Land
Common and Private
Forest and Non-Forest
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Original Project Deadline
Whether the Project has been Delayed
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Government or community-regulated urban commons, Residential area
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
Source/Reference
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
Type of investment:
Year of Estimation
Has the Conflict Ended?
No
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Forced evictions/dispossession of land
Legal Status:
In Court
Status of Case In Court
Pending
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
No
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case Number
CWP-1471-2024. CWP-PIL-68-2023
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Displacement
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Reported Details of the Violation:
Demolition of both legally-owned setteled possession and encroachments without notice or scope of rehabilitation.
Date of Violation
August 2, 2023
Location of Violation
Nuh
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP), Town and Country Planning Department, Haryana Police, Forest Department and local panchayats
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
Yes
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
Nuh residents
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?
2,754 Gujarat Villages without Grazing Land, Residents Allege Forceful Acquisition by State
AMC Provides Rehabilitation to Street Vendors in Ahmedabad Following Protests Against Eviction
Farmers Oppose Limestone Mining on Fertile Land in Gujarat's Bhavnagar District
Relocated Maldharis Return to Gujarat's Gir Park, at Loggerheads with Forest Department
Delhi Development Authority Demolishes Slum in Batla House, 800 Families Left Homeless
Essar Port Threat to Mangroves, Livelihood of Fisherfolk in Gujarat
Fisherfolk Fear Livelihood Loss as Industry Body Plans Textile Park in Surat
Agariya Farmers in Gujarat Demand Seasonal Land Rights, Minimum Support Price for Salt