Assam
Nakhuti , Kamarpani, Bhetnala, Paglabasti, Hajibasti, Langsipai
,
Lumding
,
Hojai
Published :
Mar 2022
|
Updated :
May 17, 2024
Assam Government Evicts over 500 Tribal Families for 'Encroachment' in Lumding Forest
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
1500
Households affected
7200
People affected
2021
Year started
1410
Land area affected
1500
Households affected
7200
People Affected
2021
Year started
1410
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In its latest bid to free forests from encroachments, the Assam government carried out multiple eviction drives in several locations of the Lumding reserve forest in Hojai district. 

On November 7 and 8, 2021, at least 145 Garo and Chakma tribal families were evicted by the forest department. These included 55 Garo families in Paglabasti, 60 Garo and Chakma families in Hajibasti and 30 Garo families in the Langsipai area. In addition, 200 Muslim families living in Kamarpani and 170 families in Bhetnala were also evicted from the reserve forest.

The government started the eviction drive on September 30, 2021, under the directions of the Gauhati High Court. Thousands of security personnel, including Assam Police, Central Reserve Police Force and the paramilitary, were deployed to prevent any untoward incident. 

On November 11, the Indigenous Rights Advocacy Centre (IRAC) moved the National Human Rights Commission seeking immediate intervention against the gross ‘human rights violations’ of the tribespeople without rehabilitation and resettlement, terming it ‘illegal’. IRAC also asked the state to pay a compensation of Rs 10 lakh and issue land _pattas _(titles) to each of the evicted families. Representatives from the Muslim, Garo and Chakma communities submitted separate memorandums to the prime minister and the home minister indicting threat and repression.

The Lumding reserve forest, which also serves as an elephant corridor, covers an area of 22,403 hectares, of which 1,410 hectares were allegedly under ‘encroachment’. The forest department reportedly used elephants, excavators and tractors to destroy all establishments. According to officials, over 550 huts, along with other temporary structures, were demolished during the eviction. The authorities stated that as many as 1,000 people voluntarily left their homes.

According to local media reports, the Chakma families were provided temporary settlements in Deka Gaon. Suhas Chakma, founder of the Chakma Development Foundation of India, said that over 110 Chakma families have been illegally evicted from the Lumding Circle since November 8 despite the Chakmas inhabiting the area for more than 40 years.

On 9 November 2021, the All Assam Minority Students’ Union staged a sit-in protest at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi, alleging targeted harassment of the Muslim communities in Assam. Meanwhile, state Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and the Hojai Police denied claims that land brokers were responsible for all the encroachment. The police subsequently detained a few land brokers for settling many families in the Lumding Reserve Forest in return for cash.

One of the evictees told the media that his family has been living in the area for more than 20 years and demanded the authorities to resettle them to a suitable place and provide some land. The headman of Langsipai Garo village told a local news channel that the people of his village did not want to vacate the land as they had nowhere else to go. Another person informed that the authorities notified them three days before the eviction instead of the procedural 15 days. The evictees clarified that they were assigned temporary rehabilitation in the Baghtila area as directed by the police and Circle officer; however, they claimed that the land was unsuitable as it did not have basic amenities. About 204 families were relocated to a temporary relief camp in a grazing reserve in Changmaji village, which is a recently harvested rice field with sharp stubbles, without access to safe drinking water or toilets.

“No sleep, no water, no treatment. The government should either kill us or save us,” a woman told the media as her 10-year-old child slept on the ground, looking visibly sick.

As of April 2024, around 100 families, including 300 children, who were evicted in November 2021, were rehabilitated in Nakhutia Janju camp in Hojai district, Assam.

In April 2023, a local Assamese newspaper reported that 50 children in the Doboka camp in Hojai district, not far from Nakhutia Janju, had fallen ill due to poor conditions in the camp. Gauhati High Court took suo motu cognizance of the news report and sent Senior advocate Bhaskar Konwar for a field visit.

The report submitted by Bhaskar Konwar painted an upsetting picture, describing the conditions at the camp as "worse than that of a cowshed." Konwar's report detailed the lack of basic amenities like toilets and bathrooms. "The tubewells…are full of iron and there is no provision for filtration. Additionally, there is no drainage system, no electricity...," the report stated.

The report also highlighted the residents' hardships: "Majority of them do not have proper clothing… They appear malnourished and have pale fingernails. Several children are still suffering from various ailments,” it stated.

Taking notice of these concerning conditions, the Gauhati High Court slammed the government and ordered the authorities to immediately address the issues and provide potable water supply in the camps.

While the East Mojo report had the number of families residing at the Doboka camp as 405, the Indian Express report stated it was 350.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for land titles for the landless and displaced

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Hojai district administration, Hojai Deputy Commissioner

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

All Assam Minorities Students’ Union, Chakma Development Foundation of India

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia

East Street Journal Asia is a multilingual, Web-based news journal. It is an independent media organisation whose goal is to make transparent, unbiased and data-driven journalism accessible to all.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us