Uttar Pradesh
Banda, Mahoba, Hamirpur
,
Jhir Saheva
,
Mahoba
Published :
Jun 2017
|
Updated :
Protests Against Land Acquisition for Arjun Sahayak irrigation Project in Mahoba
Reported by
Pushpendra Singh
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
10000
People affected
2009
Year started
1729
Land area affected
Households affected
10000
People Affected
2009
Year started
1729
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Bundelkhand's ambitious Arjun Sahayak Irrigation project has been surrounded by controversies since the project commenced in 2009. The work was stopped by the farmers of Mahoba district, who protested against nonpayment of compensation for the fields coming under the submergence area of the project. Even after multiple visits to the irrigation department, the farmers couldn't get a relief. The Project, with an revised investment over INR 2000 crores is going to affect more than 100 villages in Banda, Mahoba, and Hamirpur districts of Uttar Pradesh's Bundelkhand region. The Central government is supposed to bear 90 percent of the project cost and the state was to take care of the remaining 10 percent. So far 223 farmers' lands have been acquired with mutual consent. For the farmers whose fields will be submerged under the project, the government had decided compensation as per the circle rate agreed by the district level committee. So far, 300 farmers have received compensation as per the circle rate and about 10,000 farmers are still awaiting compensation. Pankaj Singh Parihar, resident of village Gugaura, which is affected by the project, and Gulab Singh Rajput of village Jujhar say that the government is taking the land without the consent of the farmers, the result of which has been that so far 3 people have committed suicide, including the selfimmolation by a farmer. He says that 1543 hectares of land is yet to be purchased. Mahoba District Collector Anuj Kumar Jha says that the land is being taken with mutual consent from the farmers and farmers are being given compensation of Rs 12 to 13 lakh per hectare. The farmers have decided not to let the dam work take place until compensation is settled. In March 2018, the state government provided its 10 percent share to the project by sanctioning 161 crores. It was reported in 2019 that land is being purchased for project and 90% of the work is completed. The project is expected to finish by 2020.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2593

Type of investment:

Revised Investment

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Irrigation & Water Resources Department, UP Government.

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Pushpendra Singh


Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us