On 11 January 2023, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) issued eviction notices to families living in and around Tughlaqabad Fort in New Delhi. ASI, the nodal agency responsible for maintaining sites of historic importance, deemed the settlements in the area 'illegal encroachments' and in violation of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act of 1958 (AMASR Act).
The notice informed residents that demolition would begin within 15 days and directed them to vacate the premises by 26 January. It did not provide any information on rehabilitation or provisioning of temporary shelter for the residents.
The Tughlaqabad Fort is a centrally protected monument under the AMASR Act. The fort's walls, gateways, bastions, and internal and external buildings all fall within the definition of a 'protected' site.
Tughlaqabad Fort and the surrounding area is also home to a number of settlements. The eviction notices were served to residents of Bengali Colony, one of the largest settlements of the area, where most residents are daily-wage labourers or domestic workers. The residents claim they have lived there for decades.
A large section of the community living in the colony has migrated from West Bengal, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. Many residents have even registered their houses under the Pradhan Mantri-Uday Scheme in December 2020, a scheme launched by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs in 2019 to confer ownership rights to properties in 1,731 unauthorised colonies.
After receiving the notice, community members organised protests and roadblocks. But they have failed to get legal protection from the demolition, a member of AICCTU who has been protesting along with the residents told LCW.
The scale of the eviction prompted the Delhi Commission for the Protection of Children to take up the matter suo-moto. It wrote to ASI demanding the withdrawal of the order until adequate arrangements are made for the rehabilitation of the families and thousands of children living in Bengali Colony, adding that the eviction drive will severely affect children's education. An RTI application filed by LCW found that to date no orders have been issued by any government authority to suspend the eviction.
Community members claim that the presence of police and CRPF personnel in the area has increased after their protests began. The entrances and exits to the colony have been barricaded to control movement and prevent people from gathering. There have also been reports of use of police force against protesting residents, as well as routine harassment.
Some affected families even possess certificates showing that the land was allotted to them under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana.
The eviction notices come in the backdrop of a long-running litigation. A public interest litigation was filed by Mr. S.N. Bhardwaj, in the Delhi High Court in 2001 against the unauthorised constructions and encroachments in and around the fort. The High Court however disposed that petition.
Dissatisfied with the disposal, Bhardwaj approached the Supreme Court (SC) with a similar plea through a special leave petition.
In 2003, the SC issued an order that no further construction should take place within the Fort area. The SC also directed the Delhi government, Delhi Development Authority, Municipal Corporation of Delhi and the Police to assist the ASI in preventing any unauthorised construction from taking place in the area.
In September 2011, the SC directed ASI to take action against unauthorised constructions in the Fort, and submit a report within eight weeks. The next month, the court directed the ASI to submit an affidavit stating the number of houses that were present in the area based on an aerial survey conducted in 1993.
The ASI filed this affidavit in 2012 but also stated it was unable to complete the survey due to lack of capacity.
In 2016, the SC transferred the case to the High Court, stating that the matter now needed monitoring for compliance with its orders for removal of unauthorised constructions from the Fort.
In 2017, the Delhi High Court formed a committee to find a solution to this matter.
In November 2022, the High Court gave ASI six weeks' notice to file a status report on the matter. The court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to assist in the removal and ordered the BSES electricity board, to disconnect the electrical connections before demolition.
Residents filed an initial petition in the High Court on 25 January to stay the demolition. The judge dismissed the plea and upheld the mandate of the 2016 Supreme Court ruling.
In February 2023, the Mazdoor Awaaz Samiti, representing the residents of Tughlaqabad filed a subsequent petition demanding rehabilitation before demolition.
The High Court directed the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board, and Delhi Development Authority, to submit a rehabilitation plan to the court so that the phased resettlement of all residents could begin. It also directed the Chief Secretary to convene a meeting with senior officials from all these agencies, ASI, Delhi police, and the relevant district magistrate on February 20th, and submit a plan within four weeks.
However, the court did not grant a stay on the demolition till the said plan is submitted to the court.
On 24 April 2023, the High Court once again directed ASI to remove encroachments from the Fort area. On 30 April and 1 May 2023, a massive demolition drive was conducted by ASI over two days, rendering nearly 1000 families homeless. A resident of Tughlaqabad informed LCW that residents were not given any prior warning to the demolition which continued till nearly 9 p.m. and through the rain. He further added that no temporary accommodation or rehabilitation measures have been provided to the residents that have been impacted as a result of this eviction.
The case filed by Mazdoor Awaas Samiti is still being heard in the High Court and is listed for 16 May 2023. With no place to go, the residents currently live in make-shift shelters around the demolished sites, the resident told LCW.
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand for rehabilitation
Complaint against procedural violations
Demand for legal recognition of land rights
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Region Classification
Urban
Type of Land
Common
Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)
What was the action taken by the police?
Detention
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Released from detention
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Original Project Deadline
Whether the Project has been Delayed
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Residential area
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
Source/Reference
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
Type of investment:
Year of Estimation
Has the Conflict Ended?
No
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
No
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Non-rehabilitation of displaced people
Forced evictions/dispossession of land
Non-consultation with stakeholders
Legal Status:
In Court
Status of Case In Court
Pending
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
No
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
High Court of Delhi
Case Number
W.P.(C) 1475/2001, W.P.(C) 1160/2023
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Physical attack
Blackmail/threats/intimidation
Other harassment
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
No
Reported Details of the Violation:
1. On 15 January, hundreds of residents of Tughlaqabad Fort gathered on the Mehrauli - Badarpur Main Road to protest the eviction notices that had been put up by ASI on 11 January. During the protest, Delhi Police and the Central Reserve Police Force beat up and lathi charged several residents that were protesting - including women, many of whom were beaten up by male policemen. Protestors were also picked up by the police and put in the police buses and taken to the police station and released within a few hours. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9FKEuEUF84&ab_channel=farhanaqeelzaidi, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y95ZWl9zMPE&t=1s&ab_channel=TheWire) 2. Since the notices were issued, the residents have been staging a continuous roadblock, which has been met with police resistance. The police have put up barricades surrounding the basti to prevent people from moving onto the road or outside the confines of the basti. 3. Regular Delhi Police and CRPF presence in the basti, harassing and threatening residents with evictions. 4. On 8th May, 2023, women residents of Tughlaqabad were protesting the clearing of the malba from the demolition site. 30-40 policemen picked up 10-12 women, put them in a police bus and beat them up severly.
Date of Violation
January 14, 2023
Location of Violation
Tughlaqabad Fort
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
Residents of Tughlaqabad, Mazdoor Awaaz Samiti
What was the action taken by the police?
Detention
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Released from detention
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?