Andhra Pradesh
Gorantla Mandal
,
Chillamaturu
,
Anantapuramu
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
Farmers Sell Lands Acquired for Unbuilt Knowledge Hub in Andhra Pradesh
Reported by
Furkan Khan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2008
Year started
3580
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2008
Year started
3580
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Landbank
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Landbank
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In December 2008, the Andhra Pradesh government, through the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC), signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Lepakshi Knowledge Hub Pvt Ltd (LKH) for establishing an Integrated Global Knowledge Hub/Multi-Product Special Economic Zone in Gorantla and Chilamattur mandals of Anantapur district. The project envisaged generation of employment for up to 1.5 lakh people. LKH and its subsidiaries were to invest INR 8,000-10,000 crore for the project.
The government acquired at least 8,866 acres of land from thousands of farmers without compensating a large number of them for the same. Those who were compensated did not receive the full amount. According to reports, the Lepakshi authorities failed to set up industries but used the land to raise a loan, which was later diverted to another company, Indu Projects Ltd.
Following this, the Andhra Pradesh government decided to cancel the allotment of 3,580 hectares to LKH for violating the terms of the MoU. However, the government planned to re-acquire at least 4,000 acres from Lepakshi and add it to its land bank - lands owned by the state which are meant to be diverted for industrial use. Even while cancelling the allotment to LKH, the state had no plans of returning the land to the farmers.
Meanwhile, the farmers who were not compensated, moved court, which then ordered them to sell their land to realtors. While some farmers sold at INR 1.75 lakh per acre, those who had not received compensation sold their land at INR 6 lakh per acre.
In November 2016, the All India Kisan Sabha announced that a bike rally and meeting of farmers at Bagepalli took place to oppose the government's actions. Most farmers allege that they did not even receive any meagre amount in compensation.
According to the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, and subsequent Supreme Court judgments, any land that has been acquired by the government and remains unused for more than five years should be returned to the farmers.
On April 10, 2020, LCW tried to get in touch with the APIIC but received no response.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

10000

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2008

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Department of Industries

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC)

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Lepakshi Pvt. Ltd.

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Local residents

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Furkan Khan
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us