Assam
Panbari
,
Dhemaji
,
Dhemaji
Published :
Jun 2023
|
Updated :
September 3, 2024
Violence erupts in Dhemaji amid ongoing Assam-Arunachal border dispute
Reported by
Emilo Yanthan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2022
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2022
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Border Dispute
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Border Dispute
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

In July 2022, another border dispute was recorded between Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. The disputed interstate border of the two states experienced tension due to a group of individuals in Assam's Dhemaji district objecting to what they claim is land encroachment by certain residents of adjoining Arunachal Pradesh.

According to a senior officer from Assam, some residents from Arunachal Pradesh had put up a fence and encroached on protected forest property at Panbari in order to establish an agricultural farm. He stated that residents on the Assam side of the border had taken down the fence as protest. As a retaliation to which several individuals from Arunachal Pradesh attacked an Assamese family and stole their motorbike. The situation was brought to control by police personnel.

The border between Assam and Arunachal Pradesh is 804.1 km long, with disputes between the two states arising every now and then. This incident is said to have taken place three days after the chief ministers of both states signed the Namsai Declaration, which vowed to end border disputes between the two states.

Arunachal claims that several forest in the plain area had traditionally been owned by the tribal chiefs and communities in the hills but were transferred to Assam. A tripartite committee was established in 1987, the year Arunachal Pradesh became a state, to advocate that these regions be given back to Arunachal. The Assam government opposed the matter and approached the Supreme Court. The matter is still pending in the court.

On 5 June 2023, two persons were killed and two others sustained bullet injuries in a fresh boundary-related violence between the residents along the Assam-Arunachal Pradesh border at Torajan in Kangku circle of Lower Siang district and Panbari near Jairamour in Assam’s Dhemaji district.

The deceased were identified as Boga Chutia, of Borbila Chutiakari village, and Monitu Gogoi, of Milonpur village of Dhemaji districts.

The incident occurred when people from the Assam side were planting trees in a paddy field claimed by Arunachal. The villagers from the Arunachal side protested against the plantation drive, which led to the altercation and shooting.

The incident happened one year after an MoU was signed between Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma and his Arunachal counterpart Pema Khandu on 20 April 2022, in New Delhi, in the presence of Union Home Minister Amit Shah, to resolve the border row.

In July 2024, the Arunachal Pradesh government re-constituted six regional committees to examine and exercise the present status of the border dispute with Assam.

A notification issued by the Home and Inter-state border affairs department said the Terms of Reference (ToR) for the regional committees, as established, will continue to be governed by the provisions set forth in the original notification issued on 1 June, 2022.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Assam, Government of Arunachal Pradesh

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Emilo R. Yanthan

Emilo is pursuing her PhD in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. Her primary research areas include human and land rights and gender issues.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us