Madhya Pradesh
Barwani district
,
Chaukhand
,
Khargone
Published :
Apr 2019
|
Updated :
September 15, 2025
Delayed compensation and rehabilitation: The Kharak dam displacement struggle in Khargone, Madhya Pradesh
Reported by
Aditi Patil
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
300
Households affected
300
People affected
2012
Year started
218.01
ha.
Land area affected
300
Households affected
300
People Affected
2012
Year started
218.01
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Multipurpose Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Multipurpose Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Residents of Chaukhand village have been opposing the construction of a dam on Kharak river passing through Barwani and Khargone districts. The state government began land acquisition for the dam in 2011 even before the project got forest and environment clearances. Construction work began in early 2012 but was stalled due to protests by the residents, who demanded a comprehensive rehabilitation policy before the dam came up.

In July 2012, some people from the villages of Juna Bilwa, Kaniapani and Choukhand were forced to accept a paltry compensation of Rs 40,000 per acre as opposed to the district collector's guidelines, which fixed the compensation amount at Rs 1.6 lakh for non-cultivable land and Rs 3.20 lakh for irrigated land. The farmers were informed that they would be paid compensation in three instalments, and they were threatened with imprisonment until the project's completion if they protested.

Meanwhile, residents of four other affected villages in Barwani district -- Kamat, Kaniapani, Julwania and Muvasia -- were denied compensation. These villages are located in a reserve forest area. While some of the tribal residents have been given land rights under the Forest Rights Act, the claims of other farmers are pending.

Residents of all the affected villages in both the districts have been demanding rehabilitation since 2012 under the Jagrit Adivasi Dalit Sangathan. The construction of the dam displaced more than 300 families in the two districts, with some agricultural fields submerging under the water released from the dam. In 2015, officials cracked down on their protests, resorting to brutal lathi-charge of the tribals, including women and children, and arrest of 27 people. The matter was pushed to the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which ordered rehabilitation in July 2016.

In January 2017, the Supreme Court also categorically ordered that the displaced people be rehabilitated under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Rehabilitation Policy of 2002 and the resettlement and rehabilitation policy of 2008 under the Narmada Valley Development Authority. However, no compensation has been paid yet.

In December 2019, the tribal community members protested in front of the district collector’s office in Khargone. According to the report, they resorted to Jail Bharo Andolan while raising slogan like ‘Haq Nahi toh Jail Sahi (Jail is better than living without rights)'.  An activist associated with Jagrit Adivasi Dalit Sangathan told the media, “The families have presented their rehabilitation claims time and again, but it did not yield any benefits. The entire compensation process is stalled and people are now in jail.”

The protesters have been singing songs of resistance and are on hunger strike. Moreover, 21 protesters were arrested on December 18 and released in two days, but they were reportedly beaten up in custody.

In September 2023, dam-affected families from Bhagwanpura village held a protest demanding compensation for loss, while carrying placards before the Collector’s Office in Khargone. It was reported that Rs 13 crore had been distributed to the affected people until September 2023. However, families have been demanding a rehabilitation grant and compensation under the rehabilitation policy.

Given the ongoing hearings in the Appellate Forum, authorities say that the remaining amount will be paid after the final decision of the court.

It was also reported in September 2023 that two affected people had died by suicide, which the villagers blamed on government’s negligence and lack of proper rehabilitation measures.

In May 2025, after eight years since the order of the Supreme Court, the affected families demanding payment of the residual compensation staged a protest at District Headquarters in Khargone. As per Shivram Kanase, reportedly 129 families have still not been rehabilitated and are awaiting remaining compensation. In addition, no cognizance of displacement of another 128 families has been taken, who have not received any compensation so far.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest, Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

21

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from arrest

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Yes

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change; Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Madhya Pradesh Police

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Narmada Valley Development Authority

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Bhil and Bhilala tribes

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

21

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from arrest

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Yes

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Aditi Patil

Aditi is a freelance development researcher. She has a Master’s in Development Studies from the Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India. She has previously worked with WWF India on forest-based livelihoods and international wildlife trade. She has also worked on the Forest Rights Act in Dangs district in Gujarat. Her paper, “Forest-based livelihoods, Malki practice and Forest Rights Act in Gujarat: The case of Adivasis in the Dangs,” has been published in the book, Adivasis in India: Livelihoods, Resources and Institutions, by Bloomsbury India.

Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us