Chhattisgarh
Kunjemura, Gare, Saraitola, Murogaon, Radopali, Pata, Chitwahi, Dholnara, JhinkaBahal, Dolesara, Bhalumura, Sarasmal and Libra
,
Tihli Rampur
,
Raigarh
Published :
Jul 2017
|
Updated :
Environment Ministry Delays Clearance to Gare Palma Opencast Coal Mining in Chhattisgarh
Reported by
Asha Verma
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
13074
People affected
2016
Year started
2583
Land area affected
Households affected
13074
People Affected
2016
Year started
2583
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In August 2016, the Maharashtra State Power Generation Company (Mahagenco) got a lease for an open cast Gare Palma Sector II mine project in Tamnar block in Raigarh district. Soon after, it started the process of acquiring environmental clearance for the project. The project requires an area of over 2,500 hectares and would affect 14 villages. As per its EIA report, the mines would displace 1,679 families in Schedule V areas. But the R&R plan has accounted for 2,245 families ousted due to the project.  Residents of the 14 villages and civil society organisations have opposed the project and have accused Mahagenco and the district administration of procedural violations. Reportedly, in 2017, the district administration attempted to coerce the Gram Sabhas (Village Assemblies) of the 14 villages to hold a public hearing and consent to the project by issuing an official notice. However, the villagers immediately launched an agitation against the administration. According to them, the coercion to hold a public hearing violates the Gram Sabha's autonomy under the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, and the rightful claims under the Forest Rights Act, 2006. They also reported discrepancies and misrepresentation of information in the forms given to them.  In April 2017, the villages took out a march to protest the violation of their rights. Subsequently, they submitted memorandums to the Ministry of Coal, the Chhattisgarh governor and the chief minister as well as to the district collector and block tehsildar. Reportedly, the sub divisional magistrate denied the allegations. Meanwhile, the villagers have also voiced concerns over the consequences of mining activities on the environment and their livelihood. They fear mining would affect groundwater sources and infrastructure and aggravate the issue of flying ash.  In June 2019, the villagers gathered under the banner of Mehnatkash Majdoor Kisan Ekta Samiti to protest another attempt to organise a public hearing.  On September 27 that year,  the administration made a third attempt at organising a public hearing. The people again alleged that the company officials tried to manipulate the proceedings and boycotted the meeting. The police reportedly arrested over 50 protesters.  On the day of Gandhi Jayanti, the protesting villagers joined a mass coal satyagraha against the mining projects in Tamnar block. Residents of over 56 villages sat on a peaceful _dharna _and voiced their concerns about the exploitative mining activities and the companies responsible for it.  In December, the Expert Appraisal Committee of the coal ministry delayed granting the environmental clearance (EC) to the project and demanded the company's response to the queries concerning the social and environmental impact of the mining activities.  In February 2020, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) observed that due to forest loss, major noncompliance in rehabilitation and social cost, it could no longer permit conversion of mines to opencast. This was another blow to the project.   In January 2021, the environment ministry decided to further delay the EC to the project citing the NGTs rulings. In May, the ministry sought additional information on the project and is yet to come to a decision. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

7463

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Raigarh District Administration

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Adani Coal Company

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Asha Verma
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us