Uttar Pradesh
,
Akbar Nagar
,
Lucknow
Published :
Sep 2024
|
Updated :
1,800 structures razed in Lucknow's Akbar Nagar for riverfront project
Reported by
Nayla Khwaja
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
2000
Households affected
10000
People affected
2023
Year started
2027
Land area affected
2000
Households affected
10000
People Affected
2023
Year started
2027
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Tourism
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Tourism
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

The Lucknow Development Authority (LDA) razed around 1800 structures labeled as "unauthorised constructions" in a 50-year-old Muslim-majority neighborhood Akbar Nagar for Kukrail riverfront project. Nearly 1320 structures, including houses and commercial establishments, were demolished between 10 to 18 June, 2024, displacing around 10,000 residents.

The demolition drive was carried out amid heavy security with the deployment of the UP Provincial Armed Constabulary and Rapid Action Force to prevent resistance.

In August 2022, the Uttar Pradesh government passed a proposal to build India’s first night safari in Kukrail forest and construct a riverfront plaza along the Kukrail Nala, including a jogging track, butterfly park, fishing facilities, rainwater harvesting systems, and a ghat for Chhat Puja festivities. The Central Zoo Authority approved the night safari and wildlife park project in April 2023 and in May 2023, CM Yogi Adityanath directed officials to look into the encroachment issue.

Residents of Akbar Nagar and Bhikampur received show-cause notices from the LDA in August and September 2023, under section 27 (pertaining to demolition by the LDA of structures built without permission and/or in contravention of the masterplan) of the UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, citing "illegal constructions in flood zone." The residents were given 15 days to respond.

In October 2023, about 1,000 residents submitted detailed replies opposing the show cause notices, arguing that the properties predate the UP Urban Planning And Development Act, and that approvals were not required on plots measuring less than 800 square feet, which includes 85% of all plots in Akbar Nagar. The LDA rejected all the replies and the residents were not given the opportunity to argue their case. 

Meanwhile, at least 250 residents of Akbar Nagar filed statutory appeals under section 27(2) of the law. Following the demolition drive on 6 and 7 December in Bhikampur, residents of Akbar Nagar approached the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court on 8 December. 

On 8 December, Justice Pankaj Bhatia directed Lucknow divisional commissioner and LDA chairman Roshan Jacob to hear and decide the matter and to refrain from continuing demolition work in Akbar Nagar while the appeals were pending. On 15 December, the divisional commissioner dismissed approximately 250 appeals stating that they were baseless. A week later, authorities started the demolition drive in Akbar Nagar. Residents approached the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad HC once again, challenging Divisional Commissioner's dismissal of their appeals. The court granted an interim stay on demolitions in Akbar Nagar for one month and posted the matter for hearing on 22 January 2024. 

On 23 January 2024, the matter was transferred to a division bench, which dismissed the petitions of 24 commercial and commercial-cum-residential owners. And on 6 March 2024, directed residents to vacate their homes by 31 March.

The aggrieved residents filed an appeal before the Supreme Court the same month. On 10 May 2024, the apex court upheld the original High Court stay order and directed LDA to provide alternative housing, citing due process, rehabilitation and proportionality concerns for evicted residents. The SC asked the LDA to prove that the Kukrail Nala is a perennial river and not a city drain. Lawyers of the residents informed the court that a detailed report submitted to the LDA in 2013 by experts from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)-Roorkee referred to the Kukrail water body as a “nala” or drain throughout the document.

According to Lucknow Municipal Corporation [website](https://lmc.up.nic.in/pdf/Annexure 3.pdf), Akbar Nagar is identified as a slum. Hence, eviction from these slums should fall under the Uttar Pradesh Slum Areas (Improvement & Clearance) Act 1962 & Uttar Pradesh In-situ Slum Redevelopment Policy, 2021, after necessary rehabilitation.

In a rehabilitation effort, about 1,800 Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) houses were allotted to displaced families. However, residents say they cannot afford these houses as a 300 square feet flat in Vasant Kunj, 12 km from Akbar Nagar, cost Rs 4.8 lakh. Many argue this is not a rehabilitation policy but a sale as they have to pay a monthly instalment of Rs 2,200 for 10 years.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from detention

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Don't Know

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2026

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

1573

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2023

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Lucknow Development Authority, Divisional Commissioner, Lucknow Municipal Corporation, Department of Urban Development, Rapid Action Force (RAF)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from detention

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Don't Know

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Nayla Khwaja
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2026

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us