JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Trans-shipment terminal project faces opposition in Andaman & Nicobar Islands

Reported by

Jeff Joseph

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Radhika Chatterjee

Updated by

Published on

June 28, 2023

June 30, 2023

Edited on

June 28, 2023

State

Andaman Nicobar

Sector

Infrastructure

People Affected by Conflict

1761

Households Affected by Conflict

379

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

16610

ha

Starting Year

Location of Conflict

Greater Nicobar Island

Campbell Bay

Nicobar

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Other Kind of Infrastructure

The project will see the loss of access to the land of the Indigenous Shompen tribe and the traditional land of the Nicobarese tribes. The site is home to Leatherback turtles, Nicobar megapode (a flightless bird endemic to the Nicobar islands), Nicobar Macaque and saltwater crocodiles. Around 8.5 lakh trees will be felled, loss of 12 to 20 hectares of mangrove cover and considerable coral translocation as well is expected.

National Park

Land Conflict Summary

The plan for the Holistic Development of Great Nicobar Island in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, has become the centre of numerous conflicts, with environmentalists, civil society organisations and former civil servants expressing diverse concerns and viewpoints. The plan is centred around the development of a greenfield city which includes development of four projects: an International Container Transhipment Terminal (14.2 million TEU) along with a Greenfield International Airport (4000 Peak Hour Passengers-PHP, dual military-civilian function), a Township & Area Development and a 450 MVA Gas and Solar based Power Plant in a total area of 16610 Ha. in Nicobar district

Environmentalists have voiced strong opposition to the projects citing potential ecological damage to the delicate marine ecosystem and the destruction of critical habitats for endangered species such as the Leatherback turtles, Nicobar megapode (a flightless bird endemic to the Nicobar Islands), Nicobar Macaque and saltwater crocodiles. They argue that the construction of the port, along with the associated infrastructure, could lead to irreversible environmental degradation and loss of biodiversity in the Greater Nicobar region. The project will divert over 130 square kilometres of forest land and the felling of around 8.5 lakh trees. It is also likely to affect the mangrove cover and coral reef in the area.

While the government claims that the locals will not be displaced by the project, it has said in the Parliament that the project will use about 7.114 sq. km of tribal reserve forest land, where the Shompen, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG), and the Nicobarese reside. Moreover, the detailed EIA shows that land belonging to 1761 people and 379 households will be acquired under LARR, 2013.

The Nicobarese tribe residing in the area have raised concerns about the potential infringement on their ancestral lands and disruption of their traditional way of life. As it is, many of the residents are yet to be relocated into their old habitats after they were displaced in the aftermath of the Tsunami of 2004. On 25 August 2022, the Nicobarese [had written](https://greentribunal.gov.in/sites/default/files/news_updates/Rejoinder filed by the Applicant in Appeal 32 of 2022 (EZ) Ashish Kothari Vs. The MOEFCC & Anr.pdf)** **to the Lieutenant Governor requesting relocation to their pre-tsunami villages which are now falling within the proposed project sites. But despite their insistence on returning to their ancestral lands, both forest clearance and environment clearance were granted to the project in October and November 2022 respectively.

The Andaman and Nicobar administration has also not implemented the Forests Rights Act 2006 justifying it on the grounds of the existence of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Protection of Aboriginal Tribes) Act, 1956 (PAT56).

Under PAT56, forest land has been marked as Tribal Reserves in the island, over which local tribespeople have been given rights to use and collect resources as and when needed for their daily sustenance. By using land falling under the Tribal Reserves the proposed project will be violating the indigenous rights.

Citing violations under the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, among others, the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) has issued notice to the district authorities in Andaman and Nicobar Islands on grounds that the project will significantly affect the rights of local tribespeople and that the NCST was not consulted. 

Critics question the economic viability and sustainability of the project. They argue that the expected benefits, such as job creation and economic growth, may not outweigh the potential costs and negative impacts on the environment and local communities.

There are also concerns about inadequate consultation and lack of transparency in decision-making, leading to distrust among stakeholders. The administration has now tried to stall the entry of outsiders to the islands by denying entry to non-islanders.

The project cites the increasing presence of China as a major thrust for the project saying it will provide accessibility to the Air Force and the Navy lands located near Indira Point— India’s southernmost point.
China has constructed a deep‐water port at Chittagong, Bangladesh, and is seeking increased Naval and commercial access in the area with the Chinese Navy allowing the use of the harbours at Chittagong and access to refuelling stations for its aircraft.

A special bench of the National Green Tribunal has temporarily put the mega project on hold after a clutch of petitions appealed against the project. NGT has constituted a high-powered committee to revisit the environmental nod granted to the project. The stay is for two months until the High-Powered Committee revisits the clearance. Environmentalists have slammed the stay as being inadequate.
** **
The conflict highlights the complex interplay between the development aspirations of India along with its defence ambitions on the one hand and environmental conservation, questions of sustainable practices and the activism surrounding the same, which needs to be balanced with the rights of its indigenous communities. Balancing these competing interests and finding a mutually beneficial solution will decide the outcome of the project.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Refusal to give up land for the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Water bodies, Other environmental services, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

75000

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2021

Page Number In Investment Document:

24

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Section 2(o) [Definition of other forest dweller to include any community residing in or depending on the forestland for at least 3 generations prior to 2005] Section 4(5) [Forest-dwelling tribes may not be evicted from occupied forestland before registration and verification process is complete]
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 2 [Restriction on diverting forest land for non-forest purposes without clearance from the union government]
Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2003
Section 4(1) [Whenever the Government seeks to acquire land for any public purpose, it shall consult the panchayat in the affected area and conduct a Social Impact Assessment] Section 5 [A public hearing shall be conducted at the affected area to ascertain the views of the affected families, which shall be recorded in the SIA Report]
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 4(1) [Whenever the Government seeks to acquire land for any public purpose, it shall consult the panchayat in the affected area and conduct a Social Impact Assessment] Section 5 [A public hearing shall be conducted at the affected area to ascertain the views of the affected families, which shall be recorded in the SIA Report]
Development Challenges Specific to Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups - Recommendations of National Advisory Council dated 26 June 2013
Point II – Paras 3.1-3.7 [Recommended that rights, especially land and customary habitat rights, of PVTGS must be respected], Paras 4.1-4.6 [Recommended that implementation of FRA and PESA vis-à-vis PVTGs must be rigorously monitored], and Paras 5.1-5.3 [Recommended that after assessment of displaced PVTGs due to development projects, compensation/ rehabilitation for the same be carried out].
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Paragraph 7(i)(III) Public consultation necessary before granting of environmental clearance
**Island Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2019** Paragraph 3 [Prohibited activities within ICRZ limits include construction of ports and destruction of corals]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

Yes

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

Nicobarese, a Scheduled Tribe community, are unwilling to consent to divert their ancestral homelands, which they had used until they were displaced by the tsunami of 2004. The Shompen, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group stand to lose their traditional forest foraging grounds.

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

NOC for the diversion of tribal reserve land was signed by the BDO, the Pramukh, Andaman Adim Janjati Vikas Samiti representative (AAJVS) (for the Shompen), and the Chairman of the Tribal Council (for the Nicobarese). Both forest clearance and environment clearance were given to the Great Nicobar Holistic Development Project on 27 October and 11 November 2022 respectively. The union environment ministry gave its clearance for the forest diversion.

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Controversial land acquisition by the government

Non-implementation/violation of FRA

Violation of environmental laws

Violation of free prior informed consent

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Disposed

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

The National Green Tribunal Eastern Zone at Kolkata

Name(s) of the Court(s)

NGT

Case Number

Appeal No. 29 to 32 off 2022

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Multiple cases filed before the National Green Tribunal challenged the environmental clearance and forest clearances granted for the contested project. The tribunal noted that the area was covered by the Island Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2019 where construction of ports was expressly prohibited. The Tribunal however noted that the project has great significance for economic development and defense and national security. The Tribunal noted that there were no grounds to interfere with forest clearance or environmental clearance. The tribunal noted that the compliance with provisions of the ICRZ 2019 and tribal rights and rehabilitation will have to be ensured.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

No items found.

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

The Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change, Andaman & Nicobar Islands Administration

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Andaman and Nicobar Islands Integrated Development Corporation

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

The plan for the Holistic Development of Great Nicobar Island in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, has become the centre of numerous conflicts, with environmentalists, civil society organisations and former civil servants expressing diverse concerns and viewpoints. The plan is centred around the development of a greenfield city which includes development of four projects: an International Container Transhipment Terminal (14.2 million TEU) along with a Greenfield International Airport (4000 Peak Hour Passengers-PHP, dual military-civilian function), a Township & Area Development and a 450 MVA Gas and Solar based Power Plant in a total area of 16610 Ha. in Nicobar district

Environmentalists have voiced strong opposition to the projects citing potential ecological damage to the delicate marine ecosystem and the destruction of critical habitats for endangered species such as the Leatherback turtles, Nicobar megapode (a flightless bird endemic to the Nicobar Islands), Nicobar Macaque and saltwater crocodiles. They argue that the construction of the port, along with the associated infrastructure, could lead to irreversible environmental degradation and loss of biodiversity in the Greater Nicobar region. The project will divert over 130 square kilometres of forest land and the felling of around 8.5 lakh trees. It is also likely to affect the mangrove cover and coral reef in the area.

While the government claims that the locals will not be displaced by the project, it has said in the Parliament that the project will use about 7.114 sq. km of tribal reserve forest land, where the Shompen, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG), and the Nicobarese reside. Moreover, the detailed EIA shows that land belonging to 1761 people and 379 households will be acquired under LARR, 2013.

The Nicobarese tribe residing in the area have raised concerns about the potential infringement on their ancestral lands and disruption of their traditional way of life. As it is, many of the residents are yet to be relocated into their old habitats after they were displaced in the aftermath of the Tsunami of 2004. On 25 August 2022, the Nicobarese [had written](https://greentribunal.gov.in/sites/default/files/news_updates/Rejoinder filed by the Applicant in Appeal 32 of 2022 (EZ) Ashish Kothari Vs. The MOEFCC & Anr.pdf)** **to the Lieutenant Governor requesting relocation to their pre-tsunami villages which are now falling within the proposed project sites. But despite their insistence on returning to their ancestral lands, both forest clearance and environment clearance were granted to the project in October and November 2022 respectively.

The Andaman and Nicobar administration has also not implemented the Forests Rights Act 2006 justifying it on the grounds of the existence of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Protection of Aboriginal Tribes) Act, 1956 (PAT56).

Under PAT56, forest land has been marked as Tribal Reserves in the island, over which local tribespeople have been given rights to use and collect resources as and when needed for their daily sustenance. By using land falling under the Tribal Reserves the proposed project will be violating the indigenous rights.

Citing violations under the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, among others, the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) has issued notice to the district authorities in Andaman and Nicobar Islands on grounds that the project will significantly affect the rights of local tribespeople and that the NCST was not consulted. 

Critics question the economic viability and sustainability of the project. They argue that the expected benefits, such as job creation and economic growth, may not outweigh the potential costs and negative impacts on the environment and local communities.

There are also concerns about inadequate consultation and lack of transparency in decision-making, leading to distrust among stakeholders. The administration has now tried to stall the entry of outsiders to the islands by denying entry to non-islanders.

The project cites the increasing presence of China as a major thrust for the project saying it will provide accessibility to the Air Force and the Navy lands located near Indira Point— India’s southernmost point.
China has constructed a deep‐water port at Chittagong, Bangladesh, and is seeking increased Naval and commercial access in the area with the Chinese Navy allowing the use of the harbours at Chittagong and access to refuelling stations for its aircraft.

A special bench of the National Green Tribunal has temporarily put the mega project on hold after a clutch of petitions appealed against the project. NGT has constituted a high-powered committee to revisit the environmental nod granted to the project. The stay is for two months until the High-Powered Committee revisits the clearance. Environmentalists have slammed the stay as being inadequate.
** **
The conflict highlights the complex interplay between the development aspirations of India along with its defence ambitions on the one hand and environmental conservation, questions of sustainable practices and the activism surrounding the same, which needs to be balanced with the rights of its indigenous communities. Balancing these competing interests and finding a mutually beneficial solution will decide the outcome of the project.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Refusal to give up land for the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

Total investment involved (in Crores):

75000

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2021

Page Number In Investment Document:

24

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Section 2(o) [Definition of other forest dweller to include any community residing in or depending on the forestland for at least 3 generations prior to 2005] Section 4(5) [Forest-dwelling tribes may not be evicted from occupied forestland before registration and verification process is complete]
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 2 [Restriction on diverting forest land for non-forest purposes without clearance from the union government]
Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2003
Section 4(1) [Whenever the Government seeks to acquire land for any public purpose, it shall consult the panchayat in the affected area and conduct a Social Impact Assessment] Section 5 [A public hearing shall be conducted at the affected area to ascertain the views of the affected families, which shall be recorded in the SIA Report]
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 4(1) [Whenever the Government seeks to acquire land for any public purpose, it shall consult the panchayat in the affected area and conduct a Social Impact Assessment] Section 5 [A public hearing shall be conducted at the affected area to ascertain the views of the affected families, which shall be recorded in the SIA Report]
Development Challenges Specific to Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups - Recommendations of National Advisory Council dated 26 June 2013
Point II – Paras 3.1-3.7 [Recommended that rights, especially land and customary habitat rights, of PVTGS must be respected], Paras 4.1-4.6 [Recommended that implementation of FRA and PESA vis-à-vis PVTGs must be rigorously monitored], and Paras 5.1-5.3 [Recommended that after assessment of displaced PVTGs due to development projects, compensation/ rehabilitation for the same be carried out].
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Paragraph 7(i)(III) Public consultation necessary before granting of environmental clearance
**Island Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2019** Paragraph 3 [Prohibited activities within ICRZ limits include construction of ports and destruction of corals]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

Yes

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

Nicobarese, a Scheduled Tribe community, are unwilling to consent to divert their ancestral homelands, which they had used until they were displaced by the tsunami of 2004. The Shompen, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group stand to lose their traditional forest foraging grounds.

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

NOC for the diversion of tribal reserve land was signed by the BDO, the Pramukh, Andaman Adim Janjati Vikas Samiti representative (AAJVS) (for the Shompen), and the Chairman of the Tribal Council (for the Nicobarese). Both forest clearance and environment clearance were given to the Great Nicobar Holistic Development Project on 27 October and 11 November 2022 respectively. The union environment ministry gave its clearance for the forest diversion.

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Controversial land acquisition by the government

Non-implementation/violation of FRA

Violation of environmental laws

Violation of free prior informed consent

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Disposed

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

The National Green Tribunal Eastern Zone at Kolkata

Name(s) of the Court(s)

NGT

Case Number

Appeal No. 29 to 32 off 2022

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Multiple cases filed before the National Green Tribunal challenged the environmental clearance and forest clearances granted for the contested project. The tribunal noted that the area was covered by the Island Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2019 where construction of ports was expressly prohibited. The Tribunal however noted that the project has great significance for economic development and defense and national security. The Tribunal noted that there were no grounds to interfere with forest clearance or environmental clearance. The tribunal noted that the compliance with provisions of the ICRZ 2019 and tribal rights and rehabilitation will have to be ensured.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

No items found.

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

The Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change, Andaman & Nicobar Islands Administration

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Andaman and Nicobar Islands Integrated Development Corporation

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Andaman Nicobar

No items found.
cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now