JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Over 2,500 families evicted from Burhachapari Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Reported by

Mahesh Deka

Legal Review by

Priyansha Chouhan, Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Radhika Chatterjee, Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Emilo Yanthan

Published on

August 2, 2023

November 30, 2023

Edited on

November 30, 2023

August 2, 2023

State

Assam

Sector

Conservation and Forestry

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

2500

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

1892

ha

Starting Year

2023

Location of Conflict

Tezpur

Rupahi

Sonitpur

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)

Wildlife Sanctuary

Land Conflict Summary

In February 2023, the state forest department and district administration of Sonitpur district in Assam conducted an eviction drive to clear Burhachapari Wildlife Sanctuary and its surrounding areas from encroachers.

The drive, which lasted for three days from February 14 to February 16, 2023, resulted in the eviction of over 2513 households.

The district administration said that the encroachers had illegally occupied a total of 1,892 hectares of government land, including 1,401 hectares of the wildlife sanctuary.

Sonitpur deputy commissioner (DC) Deba Kumar Mishra told LCW that a total of 2,513 families were residing in the encroached area and they were issued notices to vacate the land before carrying out the eviction drive. He said of the 1,892 hecatres, 1,401 hectares fall in the sanctuary and the remaining is government land.

According to the DC, as per the latest survey, in the forest, 1,758 families comprising 6,965 people lived in the forest and a total of 755 families comprising 4645 people resided on the government land.

He further said over 1,700 personnel from the Assam Police and CRPF, along with staffers from civil administration and the forest department, were engaged in the eviction drive.

Hundreds of houses built by the evicted people were dismantled and crops cultivated by them were destroyed by the administration.

The DC said around 100 bulldozers, excavators and tractors were pressed into action to demolish the structures including dwelling houses, schools, mosques, and Anganwadi centres and clear the land.

The eviction drive was met with protests from some of the affected people. ** **

While speaking to LCW, some of the evicted people alleged that they had not been given prior notice of the eviction and that they had not been allowed to bring their belongings with them.

Firoza Begum, another evicted woman, alleged that the administration had said that the eviction will start on February 20, but began it on February 14 without any prior intimation.

Many of these evicted families included a large number of students who were about to sit for the Higher Secondary and Matriculation examinations. Amir Hussain, an evicted person, told LCW that many candidates who lost their books and documents due to eviction could not sit for the examinations.

A petition was filed in the Gauhati High Court challenging the eviction drive, but the court disposed of the petition with a direction that eviction can be carried out in the forest land for now, and in revenue land it can be carried out after the boundaries are determined.

Earlier, the village head of Dhania village adjacent to the wildlife sanctuary urged the authorities to free the wildlife sanctuary from encroachment.

In a recent development, the forest department claimed that the evicted people were attempting to resettle in the area again. On 17 July, 2023, a confrontation started between the two parties when the Divisional Forest Officer of Nagaon Wildlife, Jayanta Deka, led his team to the area. During the brawl, a forester and two home guards sustained injuries, while one person named Khatun was killed in “retaliatory firing”. Further, three of her relatives also sustained injuries.

On 16 July, 2023, the family members had allegedly set up tarpaulin in the area where their house was demolished. Farida Khatun, who is the niece of the deceased, stated that due to heavy rainfall in the area, they had set up temporary shelter using tarpaulin and were staying there with their cattle.

The forest officials, however, claimed that this was a method by those evicted to take back the government land and resettle in the area.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Assam Forest Regulation, 1891
Section 24 [Trespass of forest to be punished by fine or imprisonment]; Section 25(f) [Acts prohibited in forest to include clearing up land for cultivation or any other purpose]
Wildlife Conservation Strategy, 2002
Point 9 [Lands adjoining wildlife sanctuaries and national parks within a 10km radius should be notified as Eco-Sensitive Zones] Point 10 [Encroachments and illegal activities to be removed from forest land and protected areas.]
Sudama Singh v. Deepak Mohan Spolia (C.A. No(s). 21806-21807/2017, Supreme Court)
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing, A/HRC/RES/43/14, dated July 6, 2020
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
Settlement Rules under the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886
Rule 18(2) [Deputy Commissioner may confiscate, sell or destroy any unauthorized crop or buildings erected on land and eject such persons from the land], Rule 18(3) [Deputy Commissioner must publish a notice to persons they are seeking to eject for vacating the land within 15 days of the publication of notice]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Disposed

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Gauhati High Court

Case Number

WP (C) 881/2023

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

On February 15, 2023, the Gauhati High Court directed that the eviction drive carried out by the forest department must be restricted only to forest land and not over land under any revenue village. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Displacement

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

People residing in the area were rendered homeless as authorities dismantled their houses. Authorities did not provide them with any alternative shelter.

Date of Violation

February 13, 2023

Location of Violation

Sitalmari village

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Assam Environment and Forests departement , Assam Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Sonitpur District Administration

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

All Assam Minority Students Union (AAMSU)

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

A house beloning to evicted people dismantled by authorities.

Image Credit:  

Mahesh Deka

People evicted from the wildlife sanctuary.

Image Credit:  

Mahesh Deka

Video

In February 2023, the state forest department and district administration of Sonitpur district in Assam conducted an eviction drive to clear Burhachapari Wildlife Sanctuary and its surrounding areas from encroachers.

The drive, which lasted for three days from February 14 to February 16, 2023, resulted in the eviction of over 2513 households.

The district administration said that the encroachers had illegally occupied a total of 1,892 hectares of government land, including 1,401 hectares of the wildlife sanctuary.

Sonitpur deputy commissioner (DC) Deba Kumar Mishra told LCW that a total of 2,513 families were residing in the encroached area and they were issued notices to vacate the land before carrying out the eviction drive. He said of the 1,892 hecatres, 1,401 hectares fall in the sanctuary and the remaining is government land.

According to the DC, as per the latest survey, in the forest, 1,758 families comprising 6,965 people lived in the forest and a total of 755 families comprising 4645 people resided on the government land.

He further said over 1,700 personnel from the Assam Police and CRPF, along with staffers from civil administration and the forest department, were engaged in the eviction drive.

Hundreds of houses built by the evicted people were dismantled and crops cultivated by them were destroyed by the administration.

The DC said around 100 bulldozers, excavators and tractors were pressed into action to demolish the structures including dwelling houses, schools, mosques, and Anganwadi centres and clear the land.

The eviction drive was met with protests from some of the affected people. ** **

While speaking to LCW, some of the evicted people alleged that they had not been given prior notice of the eviction and that they had not been allowed to bring their belongings with them.

Firoza Begum, another evicted woman, alleged that the administration had said that the eviction will start on February 20, but began it on February 14 without any prior intimation.

Many of these evicted families included a large number of students who were about to sit for the Higher Secondary and Matriculation examinations. Amir Hussain, an evicted person, told LCW that many candidates who lost their books and documents due to eviction could not sit for the examinations.

A petition was filed in the Gauhati High Court challenging the eviction drive, but the court disposed of the petition with a direction that eviction can be carried out in the forest land for now, and in revenue land it can be carried out after the boundaries are determined.

Earlier, the village head of Dhania village adjacent to the wildlife sanctuary urged the authorities to free the wildlife sanctuary from encroachment.

In a recent development, the forest department claimed that the evicted people were attempting to resettle in the area again. On 17 July, 2023, a confrontation started between the two parties when the Divisional Forest Officer of Nagaon Wildlife, Jayanta Deka, led his team to the area. During the brawl, a forester and two home guards sustained injuries, while one person named Khatun was killed in “retaliatory firing”. Further, three of her relatives also sustained injuries.

On 16 July, 2023, the family members had allegedly set up tarpaulin in the area where their house was demolished. Farida Khatun, who is the niece of the deceased, stated that due to heavy rainfall in the area, they had set up temporary shelter using tarpaulin and were staying there with their cattle.

The forest officials, however, claimed that this was a method by those evicted to take back the government land and resettle in the area.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Assam Forest Regulation, 1891
Section 24 [Trespass of forest to be punished by fine or imprisonment]; Section 25(f) [Acts prohibited in forest to include clearing up land for cultivation or any other purpose]
Wildlife Conservation Strategy, 2002
Point 9 [Lands adjoining wildlife sanctuaries and national parks within a 10km radius should be notified as Eco-Sensitive Zones] Point 10 [Encroachments and illegal activities to be removed from forest land and protected areas.]
Sudama Singh v. Deepak Mohan Spolia (C.A. No(s). 21806-21807/2017, Supreme Court)
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing, A/HRC/RES/43/14, dated July 6, 2020
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
Settlement Rules under the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886
Rule 18(2) [Deputy Commissioner may confiscate, sell or destroy any unauthorized crop or buildings erected on land and eject such persons from the land], Rule 18(3) [Deputy Commissioner must publish a notice to persons they are seeking to eject for vacating the land within 15 days of the publication of notice]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Disposed

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Gauhati High Court

Case Number

WP (C) 881/2023

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

On February 15, 2023, the Gauhati High Court directed that the eviction drive carried out by the forest department must be restricted only to forest land and not over land under any revenue village. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Displacement

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

People residing in the area were rendered homeless as authorities dismantled their houses. Authorities did not provide them with any alternative shelter.

Date of Violation

February 13, 2023

Location of Violation

Sitalmari village

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Assam Environment and Forests departement , Assam Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Sonitpur District Administration

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Deba Kumar Mishra, Deputy Commissioner, Sonitpur district

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

All Assam Minority Students Union (AAMSU)

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:
A house beloning to evicted people dismantled by authorities.

A house beloning to evicted people dismantled by authorities.

Image Credit:  

Mahesh Deka

A house beloning to evicted people dismantled by authorities.

People evicted from the wildlife sanctuary.

Image Credit:  

Mahesh Deka

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch
cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now