JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Hoteliers build illegal road inside Nainital bird reserve, NGT junks PIL to assess environmental damage

Reported by

Chicu Iogariwar

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Published on

December 21, 2023

December 22, 2023

Edited on

December 21, 2023

State

Uttarakhand

Sector

Infrastructure

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

0

ha

Starting Year

2022

Location of Conflict

Pangot

Budh

Nainital

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Roads

Environmental/Ecological Damage

Wildlife Sanctuary

Land Conflict Summary

The Naina Devi Himalayan Bird Conservation Reserve, encompassing an area of 111.9 sq km in Nainital district, was notified on 9 March, 2015. This was done with the twin goals of conserving the rich flora and fauna present in the Kosi and Naina forest ranges as well as to increase tourism-related livelihoods in the surrounding villages while curbing the rampant development of resorts in this fragile area.

With time, the popularity of the reserve increased and brought in tourists. This unfortunately also led to the development of tourism-related infrastructure in the area. While any construction within the Bird Conservation Reserve needs the permission of the Forest Department, the widening of a road has led to controversy and conflicts around land use. The road is located in the Naina Devi Bird Reserve at Kilbury, Pangot area of Nainital.

The village of Budhalakot received permission for a pedestrian path through the reserve forest in 2013. However, the land was purchased by a builder named Upendra Jindal who allegedly proceeded to widen the road and make it accessible to motor traffic. 

The Gram Pradhan filed a PIL with the Uttarakhand High Court stating that this road, allegedly done in a collusion between some hotel owners and Forest Department officials, was threatening the fauna in the area. The PIL stated that the builder bought the village land allegedly with the help of Poonam Chand, an officer of the Tourism Department, in 2013 and began building a motorable road, destroying valuable reserve forest area, to make a four-storeyed hotel he owns in Pangot accessible to people. 

The High Court stopped the construction of this motorable road on 12 September 2022. 

Despite this, widening of the road appears to have continued. This prompted the filing of a petition with the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on 13 September 2023, almost exactly a year after the High Court order. The tribunal constituted a committee to look into this matter. However, after considering the report filed by the committee, which stated that forest authorities were present while construction of the 'kaccha' road was ongoing, the Tribunal has disposed of the case.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 2 [Restriction on diverting forest land for non-forest purposes without clearance from the union government]
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
Section 5C [Functions of the National Board of Wildlife (NBWL) include carrying out impact assessment of any development activity which can impact wildlife or its habitat] Section 29 [Permit granted by Chief Wildlife Warden is necessary for any action which may affect or destroy habitats for wildlife in a sanctuary] Section 33 [Chief Wild Life Warden may permit construction of roads which may be necessary for functioning of the sanctuary] Section 35(6) [Permit of the NBWL is necessary for any action which may affect or destroy habitats for wildlife in a national park]
In re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India and Ors. (WP (C) No. 202 of 1995, Supreme Court)
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Disposed

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

National Green Tribunal

Case Number

Original Application No. 560/2023

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

The application filed before the Tribunal was first taken up on September 21, 2023. The petitioners had alleged that the road widening was in violation of the provisions of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980. The Tribunal constituted a joint committee to look into the matter and directed the committee to disclose the names of the hotel owners responsible for the construction of the road. The matter was taken up again on December 11, 2023. However, no report had been filed by the Committee on the date. On December 15, the Tribunal noted that a report had been filed on December 13. The report noted that the road was unpaved and no trees had been cut. Further, forest authorities were noted to be present when the road construction was happening. The Tribunal was satisfied with the same and disposed of the matter on the date.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Advocacy (for inclusion in courts)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

District Magistrate Nainital, DFO Nainital, Additional Director Tourism

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Jindal Hotels

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Gram Panchayat, Budhalakote

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

The Naina Devi Himalayan Bird Conservation Reserve, encompassing an area of 111.9 sq km in Nainital district, was notified on 9 March, 2015. This was done with the twin goals of conserving the rich flora and fauna present in the Kosi and Naina forest ranges as well as to increase tourism-related livelihoods in the surrounding villages while curbing the rampant development of resorts in this fragile area.

With time, the popularity of the reserve increased and brought in tourists. This unfortunately also led to the development of tourism-related infrastructure in the area. While any construction within the Bird Conservation Reserve needs the permission of the Forest Department, the widening of a road has led to controversy and conflicts around land use. The road is located in the Naina Devi Bird Reserve at Kilbury, Pangot area of Nainital.

The village of Budhalakot received permission for a pedestrian path through the reserve forest in 2013. However, the land was purchased by a builder named Upendra Jindal who allegedly proceeded to widen the road and make it accessible to motor traffic. 

The Gram Pradhan filed a PIL with the Uttarakhand High Court stating that this road, allegedly done in a collusion between some hotel owners and Forest Department officials, was threatening the fauna in the area. The PIL stated that the builder bought the village land allegedly with the help of Poonam Chand, an officer of the Tourism Department, in 2013 and began building a motorable road, destroying valuable reserve forest area, to make a four-storeyed hotel he owns in Pangot accessible to people. 

The High Court stopped the construction of this motorable road on 12 September 2022. 

Despite this, widening of the road appears to have continued. This prompted the filing of a petition with the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on 13 September 2023, almost exactly a year after the High Court order. The tribunal constituted a committee to look into this matter. However, after considering the report filed by the committee, which stated that forest authorities were present while construction of the 'kaccha' road was ongoing, the Tribunal has disposed of the case.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 2 [Restriction on diverting forest land for non-forest purposes without clearance from the union government]
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
Section 5C [Functions of the National Board of Wildlife (NBWL) include carrying out impact assessment of any development activity which can impact wildlife or its habitat] Section 29 [Permit granted by Chief Wildlife Warden is necessary for any action which may affect or destroy habitats for wildlife in a sanctuary] Section 33 [Chief Wild Life Warden may permit construction of roads which may be necessary for functioning of the sanctuary] Section 35(6) [Permit of the NBWL is necessary for any action which may affect or destroy habitats for wildlife in a national park]
In re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India and Ors. (WP (C) No. 202 of 1995, Supreme Court)
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Disposed

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

National Green Tribunal

Case Number

Original Application No. 560/2023

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

The application filed before the Tribunal was first taken up on September 21, 2023. The petitioners had alleged that the road widening was in violation of the provisions of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980. The Tribunal constituted a joint committee to look into the matter and directed the committee to disclose the names of the hotel owners responsible for the construction of the road. The matter was taken up again on December 11, 2023. However, no report had been filed by the Committee on the date. On December 15, the Tribunal noted that a report had been filed on December 13. The report noted that the road was unpaved and no trees had been cut. Further, forest authorities were noted to be present when the road construction was happening. The Tribunal was satisfied with the same and disposed of the matter on the date.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Advocacy (for inclusion in courts)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

District Magistrate Nainital, DFO Nainital, Additional Director Tourism

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Jindal Hotels

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Gram Panchayat, Budhalakote

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Uttarakhand

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now